Abes Unfortunate Demise

Rise and Shine. During a blistering Washington, D.C. heatwave, a wax statue of Abraham Lincoln found itself in a meltdown of historic proportions—literally. Designed for an outdoor display, the statue couldn’t withstand the scorching temperatures and began to soften under the relentless sun. Onlookers watched as Honest Abe’s features slowly sagged and melted, transforming the once-majestic figure into a droopy, surreal version of the 16th president. Photos of the "Melted Abe" quickly went viral, turning the heatwave into an unexpected comedy show and proving that even in wax form, Lincoln could still make headlines—just not the kind anyone saw coming.

Top Stories

OpenAI Faces Leadership Exodus Amid Growing Challenges

Neon Bees

OpenAI's leadership is undergoing significant changes as three key figures announce their departures, compounding the company's ongoing challenges with legal battles and high-profile exits. Co-founder John Schulman has recently left for rival Anthropic, citing a desire to focus more deeply on AI alignment and return to hands-on technical work. His departure follows that of Jan Leike, another key leader in OpenAI's superalignment group, who also joined Anthropic in May. Around the same time, chief scientist and co-founder Ilya Sutskever left to launch his own startup aimed at developing "safe superintelligence," further thinning OpenAI's leadership ranks.

Adding to the turbulence, Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president and one of the remaining original founders, announced an extended leave of absence until the end of the year. His departure leaves a noticeable gap in the company’s leadership during a critical period. Peter Deng, a high-profile AI figure who previously held leadership roles at Meta, Uber, and Airtable, has also exited the company, contributing to the growing list of significant departures. These exits come as OpenAI is embroiled in a legal battle with Elon Musk, who has revived a lawsuit against the company and two of its founders, challenging OpenAI's commitment to its original non-profit status and ethical AI development.

As competition in the AI industry intensifies and its leadership team diminishes, OpenAI faces one of its most formidable challenges yet. Of the original 11 founders, only three remain at the company, underscoring a significant shift as the organization strives to stabilize and continue innovating in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. How OpenAI navigates these turbulent times could shape its future and the broader AI landscape.

Musk Sues OpenAI Again Over Broken Promises

Meta

Elon Musk is reigniting his legal battle with OpenAI, taking aim at co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman with fresh allegations. Musk’s lawsuit claims he was duped into co-founding the AI company under false promises of safety, transparency, and a commitment to keeping the technology open-source. Now, he’s alleging that OpenAI’s shift to a profit-driven model was part of a “long con” by Altman and Brockman.

The lawsuit doesn’t stop there—it accuses the duo of self-dealing and conflicts of interest, which Musk says led to the betrayal of OpenAI’s founding principles. He’s not just asking for financial restitution but is pushing for Altman to give up what Musk calls “ill-gotten gains.” The complaint also throws shade on OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft, claiming a secret clause could upend AI development once artificial general intelligence (AGI) is achieved.

Major Takeaways:

  • New Legal Battle: Musk accuses OpenAI co-founders of luring him in under false pretenses, only to pivot to a profit-driven model.

  • Serious Allegations: The lawsuit charges Altman and Brockman with self-dealing and conflicts of interest, leading to a betrayal of OpenAI’s founding principles.

  • Microsoft Partnership: Musk claims a secret clause in OpenAI’s deal with Microsoft could impact the future of AI development.

  • Broader Implications: The case could set new precedents for accountability in the AI industry.

As this case unfolds, it’s sure to spark conversations about the ethics of AI development and corporate responsibility. With accusations ranging from fraud to violations of federal racketeering laws, Musk’s lawsuit could set new standards for how AI companies are held to their original missions.

Is AI the Next Big Thing or Just Another Tech Fad?"

Is AI the next electricity or just another PC? The debate rages on as experts weigh in on whether artificial intelligence will spark a productivity revolution or just fizzle out like past tech innovations. Optimists, like Goldman Sachs, predict AI could supercharge the global economy, adding a whopping 7% by 2033. But not everyone’s buying into the hype. MIT economist Daron Acemoglu recently poured cold water on those projections, suggesting AI’s impact on GDP might be a modest 1.1% over the next decade—far from the industrial revolutions of yesteryear.

At the Fortune Brainstorm AI event in Singapore, speakers aimed to cut through the noise. Panos Madamopoulos-Moraris of Stanford University’s Human-Centered AI Institute urged companies to temper their expectations, warning that AI’s real benefits might take time to materialize. He cautioned that while the long-term impact of AI could be transformative, the short-term returns might not live up to the buzz. Meanwhile, Honeywell’s Anant Maheshwari envisioned a future where AI reshapes industries like aviation, possibly reducing the number of pilots needed per flight—though he admitted the idea of flying solo with AI might make some passengers queasy.

But before we start worrying about Skynet taking all our jobs, Madamopoulos-Moraris offered a reassuring perspective. He pointed out that AI is more likely to complement human workers than replace them entirely. In sectors like healthcare, where there’s already a shortage of professionals, AI could help fill the gaps rather than push people out. As he put it, while AI might change how we work, it’s not likely to take over the world anytime soon—so we can all breathe a little easier.

Perplexity AI's Rapid Rise Shakes Up the Search Game

Perplexity AI is making waves in the AI-powered search engine space, with growth numbers that are hard to ignore. Since the start of the year, the San Francisco-based start-up has seen its monthly revenues and usage skyrocket seven-fold, thanks in part to a fresh $250 million funding round. Perplexity is now answering 250 million questions a month, a massive leap from the 500 million queries it handled throughout the entirety of 2023. But as with any tech start-up riding high, there’s a bit of turbulence along the way—especially when you’re pivoting from subscriptions to ad-based revenue, putting you in direct competition with the search giant, Google.

Despite the challenges, Perplexity isn’t backing down. The company’s chief business officer, Dmitry Shevelenko, insists that their laser-focused mission of providing answers with high-quality sources gives them an edge over bigger players like OpenAI. And with backing from industry heavyweights like Nvidia, Jeff Bezos, and SoftBank’s Vision Fund 2, Perplexity’s valuation has tripled to $3 billion, signaling that investors are betting big on this up-and-comer. However, the introduction of advertising and past accusations of plagiarism have raised some eyebrows, making the road ahead one to watch closely.

What You Need to Know:

  • Skyrocketing Growth: Perplexity AI's monthly revenues and usage have increased seven-fold this year, fueled by a $250 million funding round.

  • Big Bets: The company’s valuation has surged to $3 billion, with investments from Nvidia, Jeff Bezos, and SoftBank’s Vision Fund 2.

  • Pivot to Ads: Perplexity is shifting from subscriptions to an ad-based model, putting it in direct competition with Google.

  • Controversies: The start-up has faced plagiarism accusations but has made changes to improve attribution and transparency.

Gif of the day

Tenor


More Interesting Reads…

Insight of the day…

“Nobody phrases it this way, but I think that artificial intelligence is almost a humanities discipline. It's really an attempt to understand human intelligence and human cognition.”

Sebastian Thrun