- Neon Bees
- Posts
- Hamster Exodus
Hamster Exodus
Sora Leak, Silicon Valley Partners with DoD, & Perplexity Dives into Harware
Rise and Shine. TAP Air Portugal wasn’t ready for a rodent rebellion when 132 hamsters decided they’d had enough of the cage life. Mid-flight, these pint-sized daredevils chewed through their enclosures and turned the cargo hold into the ultimate hamster playground. Forget snakes on a plane—this was “Hamsters Gone Wild,” with tiny paws scurrying, wheels spinning, and mini jail breaks happening all at once. Baggage handlers were left with the impossible task of rounding up these furry escape artists, armed with nothing but nets, snacks, and sheer determination. Rumor has it, one hamster was spotted gnawing through a wire, wearing tiny aviator goggles, clearly ready to take the whole operation airborne. Four days later, every hamster was accounted for, but let’s be honest—these critters were the real MVPs of midair mischief. Somewhere, they’re drafting a sequel.
Top Stories
Sora Leak Sparks OpenAI Controversy
OpenAI
OpenAI’s highly anticipated video tool, Sora, hit turbulence this week when a group of artist beta testers leaked access to its API. In an open letter on Hugging Face, the artists accused OpenAI of exploiting them for PR under the guise of creative collaboration. The leaked access sparked a frenzy online, with users rushing to try Sora’s ability to generate 10-second 1080P clips before OpenAI shut it down.
Sora is positioned as a breakthrough in AI video, but testers claim it doesn’t prioritize artists’ needs. OpenAI defended its approach, stating “hundreds of artists” shaped Sora through voluntary participation and support like grants. While OpenAI says it’s committed to making Sora safe and useful, the protest highlights growing tensions with the creative community.
Marc Rotenberg of the Center for AI and Digital Policy called the leak ironic, given OpenAI’s original mission of open-access research. He noted that while the artists’ protest echoes the company’s founding vision, it’s likely less exciting for Microsoft, which invested billions in OpenAI’s proprietary models.
The leak didn’t expose Sora’s full “brains,” but it reignited concerns over how generative AI models rely on massive datasets, often including artists’ work without proper consent. As OpenAI pushes Sora forward, the challenge will be balancing groundbreaking innovation with fair treatment of creatives.
Key Implications of the Sora API Leak
Trust Issues with Creatives: The protest underscores growing mistrust between artists and AI companies over collaboration practices and the use of their work.
Copyright and Ethical Concerns: Generative AI’s reliance on datasets scraped from the internet raises questions about copyright and exploitation of creative content.
Reputation and Regulatory Risks: OpenAI faces reputational challenges and could see increased scrutiny over how its tools are developed and marketed.
Pressure on Partnerships: With significant investments from companies like Microsoft, OpenAI must balance innovation with addressing ethical concerns to maintain credibility.
Silicon Valley Joins Forces with the Pentagon
Neon Bees
Silicon Valley is tightening its ties with the Pentagon, with AI giants like OpenAI, Meta, and Google pursuing defense contracts. Once avoided, military work is now seen as a lifeline for companies burning billions on development, as the DoD emerges as a key customer with its massive budget.
Generative AI is being tested for tasks like data sorting, cybersecurity, and robotic autonomy. While drone warfare gets attention, much of the DoD’s AI work involves mundane tasks like labeling and file analysis. The department has already awarded nearly $1 billion in contracts over two years, with more opportunities ahead.
AI companies are dropping restrictions to embrace defense work. OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic are pursuing military use cases, while backers like Microsoft and Amazon are leveraging cloud dominance for lucrative deals. Even Google, after Project Maven backlash, has softened its stance.
The DoD is investing billions in AI, including robotics, chip manufacturing, and loans for startups. Its Office of Strategic Capital has allocated nearly $1 billion for AI projects, signaling long-term innovation goals. Defense contracts aren’t just lucrative—they offer pathways to market dominance.
Though AI hasn’t yet revolutionized battlefields, Pentagon partnerships could accelerate progress. With a $1 trillion budget, the DoD sees AI as “critical” to future conflicts, potentially reshaping the tech industry—and boosting its bottom line.
Perplexity Teases AI Hardware
Perplexity
Perplexity, the AI-powered search engine, is flirting with hardware. CEO Aravind Srinivas teased a $50 voice-to-voice Q&A device on X, promising to make it if his post hit 5,000 likes. It did, and his reply—“Alright. LFG!”—suggests we might see this gadget sooner than later.
AI startups are obsessed with hardware lately. Midjourney formed a hardware team, and OpenAI’s Sam Altman is working with ex-Apple designer Jony Ive. But hardware is tough—Rabbit’s R1 ended up on eBay at steep discounts, and Humane’s hyped Ai Pin flopped so badly it needed recalls.
Perplexity has a leg up with cash in the bank and rumors of a $500M raise. But money isn’t everything in hardware. AI gadgets have a rough track record, and getting features and execution right is critical to avoid joining the list of failed devices.
If done well, Perplexity’s gadget could find a niche. A simple, affordable AI device has potential, but the company will need more than hype to succeed. With history as a guide, they’re up for a high-stakes challenge.
Highlights:
$50 voice-based AI device teased by Perplexity’s CEO.
AI hardware trend includes projects by Midjourney and OpenAI.
Past AI devices struggled, including Rabbit’s R1 and Humane’s Ai Pin.
Perplexity’s rumored $500M raise adds to its chances—but execution is key.
Elon Musk Takes Another Swing at OpenAI
Reuters
Elon Musk is back in court, filing an injunction to stop OpenAI’s plans to become a for-profit public benefit corporation, CNBC reported. Musk and his AI startup, xAI, also want to prevent OpenAI from allegedly restricting its investors from funding rival companies—like his own.
The drama adds another chapter to Musk’s ongoing feud with OpenAI, a company he co-founded in 2015 but left in 2018. He’s been vocal about his discomfort with its shift from nonprofit ideals to a more profit-driven model under CEO Sam Altman’s leadership.
Musk’s legal team claims OpenAI’s moves put competitors like xAI at a disadvantage in the multi-billion-dollar AI sector. OpenAI, meanwhile, argues the lawsuit is nothing more than sour grapes, accusing Musk of being bitter after his departure.
Originally founded as a nonprofit, OpenAI has since switched to a “capped” for-profit model and is now eyeing a structure that could attract even more investment. Despite Musk’s criticism, OpenAI’s star has risen sharply in recent years, cementing its place as a leader in the AI world.
Whether this latest legal volley slows OpenAI’s momentum remains to be seen, but one thing’s clear: Musk isn’t backing down in his quest to shake up the AI industry—on his own terms.
Gif of the day
More Interesting Reads…
Insight of the day…
“Technology is a useful servant, but a dangerous master.”
—Christian Lous Lange